Category: Auto Law

Technology and the car accident scene investigationTechnology and the car accident scene investigation


| | 0 Comment| 6:39 am

I settled a case a few weeks ago where the cell phone records of the defendant driver turned out to be important. She denied being on the cell phone at the time of the accident and my client was adamant that she was on the cell phone and that was why the defendant had run the red light, because she wasn’t paying attention. Turned out that when we attempted to subpoena the defendant’s cell phone records the defendant driver’s cell phone carrier was unwilling to turn over the records without an additional court order. (Note that a subpoena is a court order, so the cell phone carrier was just delaying the inevitable- eventually we would have gotten the records). The defendant was apparently concerned about what those records might have revealed, as compared to what she testified to at her deposition. Apparently those records would have jeopardized the defendant’s denial of cell phone use, because her attorney quickly agreed to settle the case for the figure we had suggested to him after I filed a motion to obtain the cell phone records.

Obviously cell phone records can be used as both a sword and a shield in terms of vehicle accident investigation, depending on who is accused of using  a cell phone. But, think of the other technologies in place that can also be used to prove or disprove liability in a car accident case. For instance…

  • Text messages/e-mails.
  • Video footage: This may be particularly true if the accident occurred during rush hour and the scene is captured by a traffic helicopter.
  • GPS devices: Garmins, Magelllan and Onstar all record information, including the driver’s route of travel.
  • Black box technology: Common on trucks, black boxes are now being equipped on private passenger motor vehicles. Black boxes are designed to record and preserve critical information at the time of an accident, just as black boxes are used in airplane crashes to recreate the events leading up to the crash. Black boxes typically record speed, braking and acceleration. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is looking at the possibility of requiring data recorders for all new vehicles.
  • Speed Pass: Data from these devices, also discoverable via subpoena as are cell records, tell where a vehicle was on the highway and can pinpoint time of day.
  • Traffic camera surveillance: This is becoming more common in cities throughout the U.S. Designed to identify drivers who run stop signs and red lights,  traffic surveillance footage can also be useful in showing how a collision happened.


Anti-Texting While Driving Bill Makes Its Way Through Pennsylvania SenateAnti-Texting While Driving Bill Makes Its Way Through Pennsylvania Senate


| | 0 Comment| 6:39 am

On June 8 2011, legislation banning handheld cell phone use while driving passed the state Senate. The bill, S.B. 314, allows police to pull over young drivers for violating the law, and police can cite older drivers only if they are pulled over for another driving infraction. This “secondary offense” rule is not as strong as it should be, but the bill moves on to the Pennsylvania House, where hopefully that provision will be removed.

It is now an established fact that distracted driving is a major cause of accidents, especially among young people. Driving and texting just don’t mix, but many drivers are simply too stubborn to realize it. It only takes a second to become distracted on the road even without using a cell phone. Studies have shown, for instance, that for a driver who uses texting, his or her collision risk is 23 times greater than when not texting.

Pennsylvania has held out long enough in making use of a a cell phone while driving illegal. According to the website of the Governors Highway Safety Association, neighboring Pennsylvania states already have strict cell phone bans on the books.

New Jersey has a complete ban on using a handheld cell phone to talk and text while driving;
New York state has a ban on handheld cell phone use while driving, which is also a primary offense, and texting while driving it’s a secondary offense
Delaware has complete bans on talking and texting while driving, both being primary offenses.
This is the best chance of getting an anti texting bill signed by a Pennsylvania governor. Hopefully for all Pennsylvania drivers, the House will move an even stronger bill forward and will get it in the Governor’s hand soon.


No Fee For Kids Program IntroducedNo Fee For Kids Program Introduced


| | 0 Comment| 6:26 am

Whether an attorney should charge a legal fee to a child when that child’s car accident case is settled without having to file a lawsuit is a decision I’ve decided to confront head on.

When a case involving a child is settled with the insurance company pre suit, the settlement and the lawyer’s fee must be approved by a judge in the county where the accident took place. Too many times I’ve been in court and have seen lawyers attempt to charge fee in cases involving a child, where the child was in the same accident as his or her parent, and the fee, as far as I was concerned, was unjustified. I’ve decided to do something about that by starting the “No Fee for Kids” program.

Here’s how the “No Fee for Kids” program works.

  • It must be a case where the child was involved in the same car accident as one or both of his or her parents.
  • The program applies to car accident cases that settle without having to file a lawsuit.
  • It applies for any child who is 12 or under at the time of the accident.
  • It has to be in a county where I regularly practice.
  • It must be a case that is not referred to me by another attorney.